diff --git a/biblio/chapters/literature.tex b/biblio/chapters/literature.tex
index 9731b98..9897f8a 100644
--- a/biblio/chapters/literature.tex
+++ b/biblio/chapters/literature.tex
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ time-domain analysis. They also stuied the influence of imperfect collocation
 of the sensors, showing that the time delay between sensors leads to a peak in
 the reflection coefficient at a frequency related to this time delta.
 
-%%% TODO? %%%
 % \cite{sheremet2002observations}
 
 \subsection{Conclusion}
@@ -479,16 +478,17 @@ boulders is sliding, rather than rolling or saltation.
 \textcite{weiss2015untangling} highlights inadequacies in the criteria that are
 generally used \parencite{nott2003waves,nandasena2011reassessment}. According
 to \textcite{weiss2015untangling}, the use of a minimum threshold on block
-displacement does not account for the possibility of a block returning to its
+movement does not account for the possibility of a block returning to its
 initial position after being slightly disloged. A new threshold is proposed on
 the minimal movement of a block, while considering the time-dependent nature of
 wave-induced flow. \textcite{weiss2015untangling} also shows the importance of
 the pre-transport conditions on block displacement.
 
 \textcite{kennedy2017extreme} derived new equations following the approach from
-\textcite{nandasena2011numerical} accounting for non-parallelepipedic blocks.
-The revised equations led to a lower velocity threshold for block movement.
-This highlights the importance of boulder shape in displacement considerations.
+\textcite{nandasena2011reassessment} accounting for non-parallelepipedic
+blocks. The revised equations led to a lower velocity threshold for block
+movement. This highlights the importance of boulder shape in displacement
+considerations.
 
 \textcite{lodhi2020role} highlighted the importance of hydrodynamic pressure in
 block displacement. A new equation was given for the threshold flow velocity