diff --git a/biblio/chapters/literature.tex b/biblio/chapters/literature.tex
index 00591ec..cf9ed82 100644
--- a/biblio/chapters/literature.tex
+++ b/biblio/chapters/literature.tex
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ Nonetheless, the representation of porosity in those models is still mainly
 based on experimental calibration, particularly for the inertia term of
 porosity induced friction.
 
-\subsection{Conclusion}
+%\subsection{Conclusion}
 
 %\paragraph{Notes}
 %
@@ -471,57 +471,94 @@ displacement. In contrast with the findings from \textcite{nott2003waves}, the
 threshold wave amplitude for block displacement was found to be similar between
 tsunami and storm waves.
 
-\subsection{In-situ studies}
+\textcite{nandasena2013boulder,liu2014experimental} performed experimental
+studies of block displacement using dam break scenarios in a flume. The results
+from both studies indicate that the primary mode of boulder motion for large
+boulders is sliding, rather than rolling or saltation.
 
-\cite{barbano2010large}: boulders deposity in Sicily -> probably tsunamis
+\textcite{weiss2015untangling} highlights inadequacies in the criteria that are
+generally used \parencite{nott2003waves,nandasena2011reassessment}. According
+to \textcite{weiss2015untangling}, the use of a minimum threshold on block
+displacement does not account for the possibility of a block returning to its
+initial position after being slightly disloged. A new threshold is proposed on
+the minimal movement of a block, while considering the time-dependent nature of
+wave-induced flow. \textcite{weiss2015untangling} also shows the importance of
+the pre-transport conditions on block displacement.
 
-\cite{paris2011}: 
+\textcite{kennedy2017extreme} derived new equations following the approach from
+\textcite{nandasena2011numerical} accounting for non-parallelepipedic blocks.
+The revised equations lead to a lower velocity threshold for block movement.
+This highlights the importance of boulder shape in displacement considerations.
 
-\cite{nandasena2011numerical}
-\cite{may2015block}
-\cite{biolchi2016}
-\cite{kennedy2016observations}
-\cite{erdmann2018boulder}
-\cite{cox2018extraordinary}
+\textcite{lodhi2020role} highlighted the importance of hydrodynamic pressure in
+block displacement. A new equation was given for the threshold flow velocity
+for block movement. An experimental validation of the models was performed, and
+showed the overestimation of the threshold velocity by previous models.
 
-\subsection{Models}
+\textcite{oetjen2021experiments} performed a review of boulder displacement
+experiments. They found that the initial position of boulders relative to the
+wave impact has a major influence on block displacement. Conversely, the
+influence of bed roughness seems to have been overestimated in the past.
+Similarly to \textcite{lodhi2020role}, \textcite{oetjen2021experiments}
+highlights an overestimation of minimum wave height for block displacement by
+earlier equations \parencite{nott1997extremely,nandasena2011reassessment}.
 
-\cite{nott1997extremely}
-
-\cite{nott2003waves} Submerged boulder:
-\begin{equation}
-u^2 \ge \frac{2\left(\frac{\rho_s}{\rho_w}-1\right)ag}
-{C_d\left(\frac{ac}{b^2}\right)+C_l}
-\end{equation}
-
-\cite{imamura2008numerical}
-\cite{barbano2010large}
-\cite{nandasena2011numerical}
-
-\cite{nandasena2011reassessment}
-\begin{equation}
-u^2 \ge \frac{2\left(\frac{\rho_s}{\rho_w}-1\right) gc
-\left(\cos\theta+\frac{c}{b}\sin\theta\right)}
-{C_d\frac{c^2}{b^2}+C_l}
-\end{equation}
-
-\cite{buckley2012inverse}
-\cite{weiss2012mystery}
-\cite{nandasena2013boulder}
-\cite{liu2014experimental}
-\cite{weiss2015untangling}
-\cite{zainali2015boulder}
-\cite{kennedy2016observations}
-\cite{kennedy2017extreme}
-\cite{weiss2017toward}
-
-\cite{bressan2018laboratory} Partially submerged boulders
-\begin{equation}
-u^2 \ge \frac{2b_wW}{\rho_w\left(b_DC_DA_{wfs}+b_LC_LA_{wbs}\right)}
-\end{equation}
-
-\cite{lodhi2020role}
-\cite{oetjen2020significance}
-
-\cite{oetjen2021experiments}:  Review
+\subsection{Conclusion}
 
+%\subsection{In-situ studies}
+%
+%\cite{barbano2010large}: boulders deposity in Sicily -> probably tsunamis
+%
+%\cite{paris2011}: 
+%
+%\cite{nandasena2011numerical}
+%\cite{may2015block}
+%\cite{biolchi2016}
+%\cite{kennedy2016observations}
+%\cite{erdmann2018boulder}
+%\cite{cox2018extraordinary}
+%
+%\subsection{Models}
+%
+%\cite{nott1997extremely}
+%
+%\cite{nott2003waves} Submerged boulder:
+%\begin{equation}
+%u^2 \ge \frac{2\left(\frac{\rho_s}{\rho_w}-1\right)ag}
+%{C_d\left(\frac{ac}{b^2}\right)+C_l}
+%\end{equation}
+%
+%\cite{imamura2008numerical}
+%\cite{barbano2010large}
+%\cite{nandasena2011numerical}
+%
+%\cite{nandasena2011reassessment}
+%\begin{equation}
+%u^2 \ge \frac{2\left(\frac{\rho_s}{\rho_w}-1\right) gc
+%\left(\cos\theta+\frac{c}{b}\sin\theta\right)}
+%{C_d\frac{c^2}{b^2}+C_l}
+%\end{equation}
+%
+%\cite{buckley2012inverse}
+%\cite{weiss2012mystery}
+%\cite{nandasena2013boulder}
+%\cite{liu2014experimental}
+%\cite{weiss2015untangling}
+%
+%
+%\cite{kennedy2016observations}
+%\cite{kennedy2017extreme}
+%\cite{weiss2017toward}
+%
+%\cite{bressan2018laboratory} Partially submerged boulders
+%\begin{equation}
+%u^2 \ge \frac{2b_wW}{\rho_w\left(b_DC_DA_{wfs}+b_LC_LA_{wbs}\right)}
+%\end{equation}
+%
+%\cite{lodhi2020role}
+%\cite{oetjen2020significance}
+%
+%\cite{oetjen2021experiments}:  Review
+%
+%---
+%\cite{zainali2015boulder}: Numerical model of block displacement