Introduction
This commit is contained in:
parent
174b764b3a
commit
564127e5b3
2 changed files with 27 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -84,3 +84,15 @@
|
||||||
journal={PhD. Universidade de Cantabria},
|
journal={PhD. Universidade de Cantabria},
|
||||||
year={2015}
|
year={2015}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{poncet2022,
|
||||||
|
title = {In-situ measurements of energetic depth-limited wave loading},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Applied Ocean Research},
|
||||||
|
volume = {125},
|
||||||
|
pages = {103216},
|
||||||
|
year = {2022},
|
||||||
|
issn = {0141-1187},
|
||||||
|
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103216},
|
||||||
|
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118722001572},
|
||||||
|
author = {P.A. Poncet and B. Liquet and B. Larroque and D. D’Amico and D. Sous and S. Abadie},
|
||||||
|
keywords = {Wave impact, Breaking wave, Loading, Breakwater, Field measurement, Pressure impulse, Multiple linear regression, Wind, Water level},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
|
||||||
\documentclass[a4paper, twocolumn]{article}
|
\documentclass[a4paper, twocolumn]{article}
|
||||||
\usepackage{polyglossia}
|
\usepackage{polyglossia} \usepackage{authblk}
|
||||||
\usepackage{authblk}
|
|
||||||
\usepackage[sfdefault]{inter}
|
\usepackage[sfdefault]{inter}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\setmainlanguage{english}
|
\setmainlanguage{english}
|
||||||
|
@ -49,16 +48,27 @@ Whether it is \textcite{nott2003}, \textcite{nandasena2011} or \textcite{weiss20
|
||||||
equations suffer from a major flaw; they are all based on simplified analytical models and statistical analysis.
|
equations suffer from a major flaw; they are all based on simplified analytical models and statistical analysis.
|
||||||
Unfortunately, no block displacement event seems to have been observed directly in the past.
|
Unfortunately, no block displacement event seems to have been observed directly in the past.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this paper, we study such an event. In february 2017, a 50T concrete block was dropped by a wave on the crest of the
|
In this paper, we study such an event. On February 28, 2017, a 50T concrete block was dropped by a wave on the crest of the
|
||||||
Artha breakwater. Luckily, the event was captured by a photographer, and a wave buoy located 1.2km offshore captured
|
Artha breakwater. Luckily, the event was captured by a photographer, and a wave buoy located 1.2km offshore captured
|
||||||
the seastate. Information from the photographer allowed to establish the approximate time at which the block
|
the seastate. Information from the photographer allowed to establish the approximate time at which the block
|
||||||
displacement occured. The goal of this paper is to model the hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater that lead to
|
displacement occured. The goal of this paper is to model the hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater that lead to
|
||||||
the displacement of the 50T concrete block.
|
the displacement of the 50T concrete block.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Modeling flow accounting for porous media
|
% Modeling flow accounting for porous media
|
||||||
Several approaches can be used when modelling flow near a breakwater.
|
Several approaches can be used when modelling flow near a breakwater. Depth-averaged models can be used to study the
|
||||||
|
transformation of waves on complex bottoms. Studying the hydrodynamic conditions under the surface can be achieved
|
||||||
|
using smoothed-particles hydrodynamics (SPH) or volume of fluid (VOF) models. SPH models rely on a Lagrangian
|
||||||
|
representation of the fluid, while VOF models rely on an Eulerian representation. VOF models are generally more mature
|
||||||
|
for the study of multiphase incompressible flows.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Testing kalliope
|
In this paper, we use two nested models: a large scale one-dimensionnal model to study the transformation of the wave
|
||||||
|
from the wave buoy to the proximity of the breakwater, and a VOF model in two vertical dimensions to study the
|
||||||
|
hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater. The large scale model uses a depth-averaged non-linear non-hydrostatic
|
||||||
|
model that was already calibrated by \textcite{poncet2022}. The nested model is a VOF model based on volume averaged
|
||||||
|
Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (VARANS) equations and a macroscopic representation of the porous armour of the
|
||||||
|
breakwater. The model is qualitatively calibrated using photographs from the storm of February 28, 2017.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Results from the nested models are compared to the analytical equations provided by \textcite{nandasena2011}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Results}
|
\section{Results}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue