m2cce/internship
m2cce/internship
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Activity

Olaflow results, better fig 1

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Edgar P. Burkhart 2022-06-23 11:12:00 +02:00
parent 5fbcdcfa8a
commit eab1c68b8a
Signed by: edpibu
GPG key ID: 9833D3C5A25BD227
5 changed files with 13 additions and 14 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

BIN
nature/fig/U.pdf
View file

Binary file not shown.

BIN
nature/fig/out_orbitals.pdf
View file

Binary file not shown.

BIN
nature/fig/ts.pdf
View file

Binary file not shown.

17
nature/library.bib
View file

@ -84,15 +84,10 @@
journal={PhD. Universidade de Cantabria},
year={2015}
}
@article{poncet2022,
title = {In-situ measurements of energetic depth-limited wave loading},
journal = {Applied Ocean Research},
volume = {125},
pages = {103216},
year = {2022},
issn = {0141-1187},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103216},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118722001572},
author = {P.A. Poncet and B. Liquet and B. Larroque and D. D’Amico and D. Sous and S. Abadie},
keywords = {Wave impact, Breaking wave, Loading, Breakwater, Field measurement, Pressure impulse, Multiple linear regression, Wind, Water level},
@phdthesis{poncet2021,
title={Characterization of wave impact loading on structures at full scale: field experiment, statistical analysis and 3D advanced numerical modeling},
author={Poncet, Pierre-Antoine},
year={2021},
school={Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour},
chapter={4},
}

10
nature/main.tex
View file

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ for the study of multiphase incompressible flows.
In this paper, we first use a one-dimensionnal depth-averaged non-linear non-hydrostatic model to verify that the
signal measured by the wave buoy can be used as an incident wave input for the determination of hydrodynamic conditions
near the breakwater. For this model, we use a SWASH model \parencite{zijlema2011} already calibrated by
\textcite{poncet2022} on a domain reaching 1450m offshore of the breakwater.
\textcite{poncet2021} on a domain reaching 1450m offshore of the breakwater.
Then, we use a nested VOF model in two vertical dimensions that uses the output from the larger scale SWASH model as
initial and boundary conditions to obtain the hydrodynamic conditions on the breakwater. The models uses olaFlow
@ -129,12 +129,16 @@ the crest increases, with a zone reaching 400m long in front of the wave where t
\subsection{Hydrodynamic conditions on the breakwater}
The two-dimensionnal olaFlow model near the breakwater allowed to compute the flow velocity near and on the breakwater
during the passage of the identified wave.
during the passage of the identified wave. The results displayed in Figure~\ref{fig:U} show that the flow velocity
reaches a maximum of 14.5m/s towards the breakwater during the identified extreme wave. The maximum reached velocity is
similar to earlier shorter waves (at t=100s and t=120s), but the flow velocity remains high for twice as long as during
those earlier waves. The tail of the identified wave also exhibits a water level over 5m for over 40s.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics{fig/U.pdf}
\caption{Horizontal velocity computed with the olaFlow model at x=-20m on the breakwater armor}\label{fig:U}
\caption{Horizontal flow velocity computed with the olaFlow model at x=-20m on the breakwater armor. The identified
wave reaches this point around t=175s.}\label{fig:U}
\end{figure*}
\section{Discussion}