Biblio: VOF models
This commit is contained in:
parent
8da4184af2
commit
f9bb5685b8
3 changed files with 140 additions and 22 deletions
|
@ -202,30 +202,110 @@ representation of the fluid.
|
||||||
\cite{altomare2017long}
|
\cite{altomare2017long}
|
||||||
\cite{wen2018non}
|
\cite{wen2018non}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{VARANS models}
|
\subsection{VOF models}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\cite{van1995wave,troch1999development}
|
\subsubsection{Introduction}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
COBRAS \parencite{liu1999numerical}: spatially averaged RANS
|
Contrary to SPH models, the volume of fluid (VOF) method relies on a Eulerian
|
||||||
with $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. Drag forces modeled by empirical linear
|
representation of the fluid \parencite{hirt1981volume}. This method uses a
|
||||||
and non-linear friction terms; \cite{hsu2002numerical}: introduced VARANS in
|
marker function, the value of which represents the fraction of fluid in a cell.
|
||||||
order to account for small scale turbulence inside the porous media.
|
|
||||||
->
|
|
||||||
COBRAS-UC/IH2VOF \parencite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave}: VOF VARANS (2D);
|
|
||||||
refactor of COBRAS code, with improved wave generation, improvement of input
|
|
||||||
and output data.
|
|
||||||
->
|
|
||||||
IH3VOF \parencite{del2011three}: 3D VOF VARANS, updated porous media equations,
|
|
||||||
optimization of accuracy vs computation requirements, specific boundary
|
|
||||||
conditions, validation. Adding SST model.
|
|
||||||
->
|
|
||||||
IHFOAM/olaFlow \parencite{higuera2015application}: Rederivation of
|
|
||||||
\cite{del2011three}, add time-varying porosity; Improvement to wave generation
|
|
||||||
and absorption; implementation in OpenFOAM; extensive validation; application
|
|
||||||
to real coastal structures.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\cite{vieira2021novel}: Use of artificial neural networks to determine porosity
|
\subsubsection{2D models}
|
||||||
parameter for VOF VARANS model.
|
|
||||||
|
Using the VOF method along with Navier-Stokes equations, several models have
|
||||||
|
been developed in order to model fluid dynamics around porous structures.
|
||||||
|
\textcite{van1995wave} first implemented 2D-V incompressible Navier-Stokes
|
||||||
|
equations using the VOF method while accounting for porous media. The results
|
||||||
|
of the numerical model were validated with analytical solutions for simple
|
||||||
|
cases, as well as physical model tests. The model yielded acceptable results,
|
||||||
|
but the representation of turbulence and air-extrusion still required
|
||||||
|
improvement.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textcite{troch1999development} developed the VOFbreak\textsuperscript{2} model
|
||||||
|
in order to provide improvements. The Forchheimer theory
|
||||||
|
\parencite{burcharth1995one} is used in order to model the behavior of the flow
|
||||||
|
inside porous media. The hydraulic gradient generated in porous media is
|
||||||
|
decomposed as a linear term, a quadratic term, and an inertia term. Those terms
|
||||||
|
are ponderated by three coefficients that need to be calibrated. Several
|
||||||
|
attempts have been made to obtain analytical formulas for those
|
||||||
|
\parencite{burcharth1995one,van1995wave}, but no universal result has been
|
||||||
|
provided. \textcite{vieira2021novel} additionnaly proposed using artificial
|
||||||
|
neural networks in order to calibrate those values, which are generally
|
||||||
|
calibrated using experimental results.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Parallely, \textcite{liu1999numerical} created a new model (COBRAS) that used
|
||||||
|
the VOF method. The model is based on the combination of Reynolds averaged
|
||||||
|
Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and a $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. The
|
||||||
|
porous media is modelled similarly to \textcite{troch1999development}. The
|
||||||
|
offered results were improved compared to earlier models as more a more
|
||||||
|
accurate consideration of turbulence outside porous media was added. This model
|
||||||
|
was further improved by \textcite{hsu2002numerical} in order to account for
|
||||||
|
small scale turbulence inside the porous media thanks to volume averaged RANS
|
||||||
|
(VARANS) equations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The COBRAS model was then reworked by
|
||||||
|
\textcite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave} to add improvements to wave
|
||||||
|
generation and usability. The main difference between this new code (COBRAS-UC)
|
||||||
|
and COBRAS is the addition of irregular waves generation. The code was also
|
||||||
|
optimized to reduce the number of iterations. The improvements allowed for
|
||||||
|
longer simulations to be computed. The predictions for free surface elevation
|
||||||
|
and pressure in front of a porous breakwater were accurate, but improvements
|
||||||
|
were still needed, in particular considering computation time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsubsection{3D models}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The combination of VARANS equations and the VOF method was then brought to 3D
|
||||||
|
domains by \textcite{del2011three} in IH3VOF. Specific boundary conditions were
|
||||||
|
also added for several wave theories. Additionnaly, an improved turbulence
|
||||||
|
model was used ($\omega$-SST model, \cite{menter1994two}), which provides
|
||||||
|
strongly improved results in zones where strong pressure gradients appear.
|
||||||
|
Strong agreement between IH3VOF and experimental results was obtained, but the
|
||||||
|
need for accurate boundary conditions limited the applicability of the model.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textcite{higuera2015application} reworked the equations from
|
||||||
|
\textcite{del2011three} as discrepancies were observed with earlier literature
|
||||||
|
and added several improvements to the model. Notably, time-varying porosity was
|
||||||
|
added in order to account for eventual sediment displacement. New boundary
|
||||||
|
conditions were added, with static and dynamic boundary wave generators as well
|
||||||
|
as passive and acive wave absorption being implemented. The resulting model
|
||||||
|
(IHFOAM/olaFlow, \cite{olaFlow}) was implemented in the OpenFOAM toolbox.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsubsection{Conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
VOF models have been developped to provide accurate results for the study of
|
||||||
|
wave impact on porous structures. The validation results from
|
||||||
|
\textcite{higuera2015application} show the capabilities of such models in
|
||||||
|
accurately representing rubble-mound breakwaters subject to irregular
|
||||||
|
three-dimensional wave fields.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Nonetheless, the representation of porosity in those models is still mainly
|
||||||
|
based on experimental calibration, particularly for the inertia term of
|
||||||
|
porosity induced friction.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%\paragraph{Notes}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
%\cite{van1995wave,troch1999development}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
%COBRAS \parencite{liu1999numerical}: spatially averaged RANS
|
||||||
|
%with $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. Drag forces modeled by empirical linear
|
||||||
|
%and non-linear friction terms; \cite{hsu2002numerical}: introduced VARANS in
|
||||||
|
%order to account for small scale turbulence inside the porous media.
|
||||||
|
%->
|
||||||
|
%COBRAS-UC/IH2VOF \parencite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave}: VOF VARANS (2D);
|
||||||
|
%refactor of COBRAS code, with improved wave generation, improvement of input
|
||||||
|
%and output data.
|
||||||
|
%->
|
||||||
|
%IH3VOF \parencite{del2011three}: 3D VOF VARANS, updated porous media equations,
|
||||||
|
%optimization of accuracy vs computation requirements, specific boundary
|
||||||
|
%conditions, validation. Adding SST model.
|
||||||
|
%->
|
||||||
|
%IHFOAM/olaFlow \parencite{higuera2015application}: Rederivation of
|
||||||
|
%\cite{del2011three}, add time-varying porosity; Improvement to wave generation
|
||||||
|
%and absorption; implementation in OpenFOAM; extensive validation; application
|
||||||
|
%to real coastal structures.
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
%\cite{vieira2021novel}: Use of artificial neural networks to determine porosity
|
||||||
|
%parameter for VOF VARANS model.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Other}
|
\subsection{Other}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -915,3 +915,42 @@
|
||||||
publisher={Molecular Diversity Preservation International}
|
publisher={Molecular Diversity Preservation International}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{hirt1981volume,
|
||||||
|
title={Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries},
|
||||||
|
author={Hirt, Cyril W and Nichols, Billy D},
|
||||||
|
journal={Journal of computational physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={39},
|
||||||
|
number={1},
|
||||||
|
pages={201--225},
|
||||||
|
year={1981},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Elsevier}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@incollection{van1993numerical,
|
||||||
|
title={Numerical simulation of wave motion on and in coastal structures},
|
||||||
|
author={Van der Meer, JW and Petit, HAH and Van den Bosch, P and Klopman, G and Broekens, RD},
|
||||||
|
booktitle={Coastal Engineering 1992},
|
||||||
|
pages={1772--1784},
|
||||||
|
year={1993}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{burcharth1995one,
|
||||||
|
title={On the one-dimensional steady and unsteady porous flow equations},
|
||||||
|
author={Burcharth, HF and Andersen, OK},
|
||||||
|
journal={Coastal engineering},
|
||||||
|
volume={24},
|
||||||
|
number={3-4},
|
||||||
|
pages={233--257},
|
||||||
|
year={1995},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Elsevier}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{menter1994two,
|
||||||
|
title={Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications},
|
||||||
|
author={Menter, FR},
|
||||||
|
journal={AIA A JOURNAL},
|
||||||
|
volume={32},
|
||||||
|
number={8},
|
||||||
|
year={1994}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\usepackage[
|
\usepackage[
|
||||||
backend=biber,
|
backend=biber,
|
||||||
sorting=ynt,
|
|
||||||
style=iso-authoryear,
|
style=iso-authoryear,
|
||||||
sorting=nyt,
|
sorting=nyt,
|
||||||
]{biblatex}
|
]{biblatex}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue