1
Fork 0

Biblio: VOF models

This commit is contained in:
Edgar P. Burkhart 2022-02-14 14:51:02 +01:00
parent 8da4184af2
commit f9bb5685b8
Signed by: edpibu
GPG key ID: 9833D3C5A25BD227
3 changed files with 140 additions and 22 deletions

View file

@ -202,30 +202,110 @@ representation of the fluid.
\cite{altomare2017long}
\cite{wen2018non}
\subsection{VARANS models}
\subsection{VOF models}
\cite{van1995wave,troch1999development}
\subsubsection{Introduction}
COBRAS \parencite{liu1999numerical}: spatially averaged RANS
with $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. Drag forces modeled by empirical linear
and non-linear friction terms; \cite{hsu2002numerical}: introduced VARANS in
order to account for small scale turbulence inside the porous media.
->
COBRAS-UC/IH2VOF \parencite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave}: VOF VARANS (2D);
refactor of COBRAS code, with improved wave generation, improvement of input
and output data.
->
IH3VOF \parencite{del2011three}: 3D VOF VARANS, updated porous media equations,
optimization of accuracy vs computation requirements, specific boundary
conditions, validation. Adding SST model.
->
IHFOAM/olaFlow \parencite{higuera2015application}: Rederivation of
\cite{del2011three}, add time-varying porosity; Improvement to wave generation
and absorption; implementation in OpenFOAM; extensive validation; application
to real coastal structures.
Contrary to SPH models, the volume of fluid (VOF) method relies on a Eulerian
representation of the fluid \parencite{hirt1981volume}. This method uses a
marker function, the value of which represents the fraction of fluid in a cell.
\cite{vieira2021novel}: Use of artificial neural networks to determine porosity
parameter for VOF VARANS model.
\subsubsection{2D models}
Using the VOF method along with Navier-Stokes equations, several models have
been developed in order to model fluid dynamics around porous structures.
\textcite{van1995wave} first implemented 2D-V incompressible Navier-Stokes
equations using the VOF method while accounting for porous media. The results
of the numerical model were validated with analytical solutions for simple
cases, as well as physical model tests. The model yielded acceptable results,
but the representation of turbulence and air-extrusion still required
improvement.
\textcite{troch1999development} developed the VOFbreak\textsuperscript{2} model
in order to provide improvements. The Forchheimer theory
\parencite{burcharth1995one} is used in order to model the behavior of the flow
inside porous media. The hydraulic gradient generated in porous media is
decomposed as a linear term, a quadratic term, and an inertia term. Those terms
are ponderated by three coefficients that need to be calibrated. Several
attempts have been made to obtain analytical formulas for those
\parencite{burcharth1995one,van1995wave}, but no universal result has been
provided. \textcite{vieira2021novel} additionnaly proposed using artificial
neural networks in order to calibrate those values, which are generally
calibrated using experimental results.
Parallely, \textcite{liu1999numerical} created a new model (COBRAS) that used
the VOF method. The model is based on the combination of Reynolds averaged
Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and a $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. The
porous media is modelled similarly to \textcite{troch1999development}. The
offered results were improved compared to earlier models as more a more
accurate consideration of turbulence outside porous media was added. This model
was further improved by \textcite{hsu2002numerical} in order to account for
small scale turbulence inside the porous media thanks to volume averaged RANS
(VARANS) equations.
The COBRAS model was then reworked by
\textcite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave} to add improvements to wave
generation and usability. The main difference between this new code (COBRAS-UC)
and COBRAS is the addition of irregular waves generation. The code was also
optimized to reduce the number of iterations. The improvements allowed for
longer simulations to be computed. The predictions for free surface elevation
and pressure in front of a porous breakwater were accurate, but improvements
were still needed, in particular considering computation time.
\subsubsection{3D models}
The combination of VARANS equations and the VOF method was then brought to 3D
domains by \textcite{del2011three} in IH3VOF. Specific boundary conditions were
also added for several wave theories. Additionnaly, an improved turbulence
model was used ($\omega$-SST model, \cite{menter1994two}), which provides
strongly improved results in zones where strong pressure gradients appear.
Strong agreement between IH3VOF and experimental results was obtained, but the
need for accurate boundary conditions limited the applicability of the model.
\textcite{higuera2015application} reworked the equations from
\textcite{del2011three} as discrepancies were observed with earlier literature
and added several improvements to the model. Notably, time-varying porosity was
added in order to account for eventual sediment displacement. New boundary
conditions were added, with static and dynamic boundary wave generators as well
as passive and acive wave absorption being implemented. The resulting model
(IHFOAM/olaFlow, \cite{olaFlow}) was implemented in the OpenFOAM toolbox.
\subsubsection{Conclusion}
VOF models have been developped to provide accurate results for the study of
wave impact on porous structures. The validation results from
\textcite{higuera2015application} show the capabilities of such models in
accurately representing rubble-mound breakwaters subject to irregular
three-dimensional wave fields.
Nonetheless, the representation of porosity in those models is still mainly
based on experimental calibration, particularly for the inertia term of
porosity induced friction.
%\paragraph{Notes}
%
%\cite{van1995wave,troch1999development}
%
%COBRAS \parencite{liu1999numerical}: spatially averaged RANS
%with $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. Drag forces modeled by empirical linear
%and non-linear friction terms; \cite{hsu2002numerical}: introduced VARANS in
%order to account for small scale turbulence inside the porous media.
%->
%COBRAS-UC/IH2VOF \parencite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave}: VOF VARANS (2D);
%refactor of COBRAS code, with improved wave generation, improvement of input
%and output data.
%->
%IH3VOF \parencite{del2011three}: 3D VOF VARANS, updated porous media equations,
%optimization of accuracy vs computation requirements, specific boundary
%conditions, validation. Adding SST model.
%->
%IHFOAM/olaFlow \parencite{higuera2015application}: Rederivation of
%\cite{del2011three}, add time-varying porosity; Improvement to wave generation
%and absorption; implementation in OpenFOAM; extensive validation; application
%to real coastal structures.
%
%\cite{vieira2021novel}: Use of artificial neural networks to determine porosity
%parameter for VOF VARANS model.
\subsection{Other}

View file

@ -915,3 +915,42 @@
publisher={Molecular Diversity Preservation International}
}
@article{hirt1981volume,
title={Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries},
author={Hirt, Cyril W and Nichols, Billy D},
journal={Journal of computational physics},
volume={39},
number={1},
pages={201--225},
year={1981},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
@incollection{van1993numerical,
title={Numerical simulation of wave motion on and in coastal structures},
author={Van der Meer, JW and Petit, HAH and Van den Bosch, P and Klopman, G and Broekens, RD},
booktitle={Coastal Engineering 1992},
pages={1772--1784},
year={1993}
}
@article{burcharth1995one,
title={On the one-dimensional steady and unsteady porous flow equations},
author={Burcharth, HF and Andersen, OK},
journal={Coastal engineering},
volume={24},
number={3-4},
pages={233--257},
year={1995},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{menter1994two,
title={Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications},
author={Menter, FR},
journal={AIA A JOURNAL},
volume={32},
number={8},
year={1994}
}

View file

@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
\usepackage[
backend=biber,
sorting=ynt,
style=iso-authoryear,
sorting=nyt,
]{biblatex}