1
Fork 0

Biblio: typos

This commit is contained in:
Edgar P. Burkhart 2022-02-23 10:16:42 +01:00
parent 3be6ede341
commit 29d11df52e
Signed by: edpibu
GPG Key ID: 9833D3C5A25BD227
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ time-domain analysis. They also stuied the influence of imperfect collocation
of the sensors, showing that the time delay between sensors leads to a peak in
the reflection coefficient at a frequency related to this time delta.
%%% TODO? %%%
% \cite{sheremet2002observations}
\subsection{Conclusion}
@ -479,16 +478,17 @@ boulders is sliding, rather than rolling or saltation.
\textcite{weiss2015untangling} highlights inadequacies in the criteria that are
generally used \parencite{nott2003waves,nandasena2011reassessment}. According
to \textcite{weiss2015untangling}, the use of a minimum threshold on block
displacement does not account for the possibility of a block returning to its
movement does not account for the possibility of a block returning to its
initial position after being slightly disloged. A new threshold is proposed on
the minimal movement of a block, while considering the time-dependent nature of
wave-induced flow. \textcite{weiss2015untangling} also shows the importance of
the pre-transport conditions on block displacement.
\textcite{kennedy2017extreme} derived new equations following the approach from
\textcite{nandasena2011numerical} accounting for non-parallelepipedic blocks.
The revised equations led to a lower velocity threshold for block movement.
This highlights the importance of boulder shape in displacement considerations.
\textcite{nandasena2011reassessment} accounting for non-parallelepipedic
blocks. The revised equations led to a lower velocity threshold for block
movement. This highlights the importance of boulder shape in displacement
considerations.
\textcite{lodhi2020role} highlighted the importance of hydrodynamic pressure in
block displacement. A new equation was given for the threshold flow velocity