1
Fork 0
This commit is contained in:
Edgar P. Burkhart 2022-06-27 10:58:32 +02:00
parent aadfda6a86
commit 9fec212d98
Signed by: edpibu
GPG key ID: 9833D3C5A25BD227
4 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

View file

@ -101,3 +101,12 @@
year={1998},
publisher={American Meteorological Society}
}
@article{dysthe2008,
title={Oceanic rogue waves},
author={Dysthe, Kristian and Krogstad, Harald E and M{\"u}ller, Peter},
journal={Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.},
volume={40},
pages={287--310},
year={2008},
publisher={Annual Reviews}
}

View file

@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ Initial analysis of the buoy data plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:wave} shows that th
orbitals that correspond to an incident wave direction. These results would indicate that the identified wave is
essentially an incident wave, with a minor reflected component.
The wavelet power spectrum displayed in Figure~\ref{wavelet} highlights a primary infragravity wave in the signal, with
a period of over 30s.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics{fig/ts.pdf}
@ -167,7 +170,18 @@ exhibits a water level over 5m for over 40s.
\section{Discussion}
\subsection{Incident wave}
According to the criteria proposed by \textcite{dysthe2008}, rogue waves can be defined as waves with an amplitude over
twice the significant wave height over a given period.
\subsection{Reflection analysis}
The 13\% difference between those values highlights the existence of a notable amount of reflection at the buoy.
Nonetheless, the gap between the values is still fairly small and the extreme wave identified on February 28, 2017 at
17:23:08 could still be considered as an incident wave.
\subsection{}
\section{Methods}
\printbibliography