Rogue
This commit is contained in:
parent
aadfda6a86
commit
9fec212d98
4 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
|
@ -101,3 +101,12 @@
|
||||||
year={1998},
|
year={1998},
|
||||||
publisher={American Meteorological Society}
|
publisher={American Meteorological Society}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{dysthe2008,
|
||||||
|
title={Oceanic rogue waves},
|
||||||
|
author={Dysthe, Kristian and Krogstad, Harald E and M{\"u}ller, Peter},
|
||||||
|
journal={Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.},
|
||||||
|
volume={40},
|
||||||
|
pages={287--310},
|
||||||
|
year={2008},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Annual Reviews}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ Initial analysis of the buoy data plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:wave} shows that th
|
||||||
orbitals that correspond to an incident wave direction. These results would indicate that the identified wave is
|
orbitals that correspond to an incident wave direction. These results would indicate that the identified wave is
|
||||||
essentially an incident wave, with a minor reflected component.
|
essentially an incident wave, with a minor reflected component.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The wavelet power spectrum displayed in Figure~\ref{wavelet} highlights a primary infragravity wave in the signal, with
|
||||||
|
a period of over 30s.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure*}
|
\begin{figure*}
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
\includegraphics{fig/ts.pdf}
|
\includegraphics{fig/ts.pdf}
|
||||||
|
@ -167,7 +170,18 @@ exhibits a water level over 5m for over 40s.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Discussion}
|
\section{Discussion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsection{Incident wave}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
According to the criteria proposed by \textcite{dysthe2008}, rogue waves can be defined as waves with an amplitude over
|
||||||
|
twice the significant wave height over a given period.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsection{Reflection analysis}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The 13\% difference between those values highlights the existence of a notable amount of reflection at the buoy.
|
||||||
|
Nonetheless, the gap between the values is still fairly small and the extreme wave identified on February 28, 2017 at
|
||||||
|
17:23:08 could still be considered as an incident wave.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsection{}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Methods}
|
\section{Methods}
|
||||||
\printbibliography
|
\printbibliography
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue