Rogue

nature/library.bib

@@ -101,3 +101,12 @@
   year={1998},
   publisher={American Meteorological Society}
 }
+@article{dysthe2008,
+  title={Oceanic rogue waves},
+  author={Dysthe, Kristian and Krogstad, Harald E and M{\"u}ller, Peter},
+  journal={Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.},
+  volume={40},
+  pages={287--310},
+  year={2008},
+  publisher={Annual Reviews}
+}

nature/main.tex

@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ Initial analysis of the buoy data plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:wave} shows that th
 orbitals that correspond to an incident wave direction. These results would indicate that the identified wave is
 essentially an incident wave, with a minor reflected component.
 
+The wavelet power spectrum displayed in Figure~\ref{wavelet} highlights a primary infragravity wave in the signal, with
+a period of over 30s.
+
 \begin{figure*}
 	\centering
 	\includegraphics{fig/ts.pdf}
@@ -167,7 +170,18 @@ exhibits a water level over 5m for over 40s.
 
 \section{Discussion}
 
+\subsection{Incident wave}
 
+According to the criteria proposed by \textcite{dysthe2008}, rogue waves can be defined as waves with an amplitude over
+twice the significant wave height over a given period.
+
+\subsection{Reflection analysis}
+
+The 13\% difference between those values highlights the existence of a notable amount of reflection at the buoy.
+Nonetheless, the gap between the values is still fairly small and the extreme wave identified on February 28, 2017 at
+17:23:08 could still be considered as an incident wave.
+
+\subsection{}
 
 \section{Methods}
 \printbibliography