Add model names in introduction
This commit is contained in:
parent
564127e5b3
commit
d1b6819e0c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -63,10 +63,11 @@ for the study of multiphase incompressible flows.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this paper, we use two nested models: a large scale one-dimensionnal model to study the transformation of the wave
|
In this paper, we use two nested models: a large scale one-dimensionnal model to study the transformation of the wave
|
||||||
from the wave buoy to the proximity of the breakwater, and a VOF model in two vertical dimensions to study the
|
from the wave buoy to the proximity of the breakwater, and a VOF model in two vertical dimensions to study the
|
||||||
hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater. The large scale model uses a depth-averaged non-linear non-hydrostatic
|
hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater. The large scale model uses SWASH \parencite{zijlema2011} a depth-averaged
|
||||||
model that was already calibrated by \textcite{poncet2022}. The nested model is a VOF model based on volume averaged
|
non-linear non-hydrostatic model that was already calibrated by \textcite{poncet2022}. The nested model uses olaFlow
|
||||||
Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (VARANS) equations and a macroscopic representation of the porous armour of the
|
\parencite{higuera2015}, a VOF model based on volume averaged Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (VARANS) equations which
|
||||||
breakwater. The model is qualitatively calibrated using photographs from the storm of February 28, 2017.
|
relies on a macroscopic representation of the porous armour of the breakwater. The model is qualitatively calibrated
|
||||||
|
using photographs from the storm of February 28, 2017.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Results from the nested models are compared to the analytical equations provided by \textcite{nandasena2011}.
|
Results from the nested models are compared to the analytical equations provided by \textcite{nandasena2011}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue