1
Fork 0

Add model names in introduction

This commit is contained in:
Edgar P. Burkhart 2022-06-07 09:25:55 +02:00
parent 564127e5b3
commit d1b6819e0c
Signed by: edpibu
GPG Key ID: 9833D3C5A25BD227
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -63,10 +63,11 @@ for the study of multiphase incompressible flows.
In this paper, we use two nested models: a large scale one-dimensionnal model to study the transformation of the wave In this paper, we use two nested models: a large scale one-dimensionnal model to study the transformation of the wave
from the wave buoy to the proximity of the breakwater, and a VOF model in two vertical dimensions to study the from the wave buoy to the proximity of the breakwater, and a VOF model in two vertical dimensions to study the
hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater. The large scale model uses a depth-averaged non-linear non-hydrostatic hydrodynamic conditions near the breakwater. The large scale model uses SWASH \parencite{zijlema2011} a depth-averaged
model that was already calibrated by \textcite{poncet2022}. The nested model is a VOF model based on volume averaged non-linear non-hydrostatic model that was already calibrated by \textcite{poncet2022}. The nested model uses olaFlow
Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (VARANS) equations and a macroscopic representation of the porous armour of the \parencite{higuera2015}, a VOF model based on volume averaged Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (VARANS) equations which
breakwater. The model is qualitatively calibrated using photographs from the storm of February 28, 2017. relies on a macroscopic representation of the porous armour of the breakwater. The model is qualitatively calibrated
using photographs from the storm of February 28, 2017.
Results from the nested models are compared to the analytical equations provided by \textcite{nandasena2011}. Results from the nested models are compared to the analytical equations provided by \textcite{nandasena2011}.